April 27, 2004

I've Got Your Schism Right Here

A few thoughts on this detestable business of Catholic officials threatening to refuse John Kerry the Eucharist:

  1. Would anyone agree that, as of late, the Catholic Church in America has lost some measure of moral clout one might call requisite to pursue this business of divvying up Communion?

  2. Is it categorically more sinful to affirm the potential for sin (e.g. voting for abortion rights) than to explicitly approve sin (e.g. ordering an execution)? OK, I understand an answer to this question would require a more robust theology than anyone's prepared to read before noon. The lowercase point I'm making is that while a priest could choose to suspend Communion for a woman on, say, the Sundays that fall between her decision to seek one and the procedure itself, a pro-choice political alignment disqualifies a person permanently—even though that political person does not (apparently) carry the "mortal sin" in his or her heart, but rather a vaguely unrepentant or agnostic disposition. That might very well be theologically sound and I just don't know, but I would expect a thorough if not exhaustive litmus test before approaching the altar if it's true. There are Biblical passages that suggest both that 1) all sin is equal, in which case being pro-choice would be more or less a discrete sin for which you can ask forgiveness, and 2) the mental suggestion of sin is as sinful as any action—in which case, I suppose, the Catholic Church ranks the pro-choice down there with the Nazis. (See also homosexuality.)

  3. If a bishop rules that he would not extend the Eucharist to some person, how strong is the hierarchical pressure for priests to abide by the ruling? So far no priest has threatened to cut Kerry off, so I guess it's not mandatory.

  4. Let's say that getting an abortion is a discrete sin, but being pro-choice is categorically worse, a sin for which you can't repent without realigning your political views (clearly the Church's goal). By the Church's own (sorry) logic, doesn't it seem that they're letting off pro-choice Catholics awfully easy?

  5. No wonder you guys are crazy guilty. What the hell?
I'm cooking up something about the 00s being a time to rediscover your Dante, regarding the way that religious-types are filling Hell and naming names. Let the excommunications commence!

PS: I am curious about these questions if you've got the answers. I don't recall anything so dramatic (or theologically subtle) from my distant Baptist roots. No one gets between a country boy and his cracker n' grape juice.

Posted by Kriston at April 27, 2004 9:54 AM
Comments

Isn't Guiliani a pro-choice catholic?

Posted by: J.Scott Barnard at April 27, 2004 1:32 PM

As is Tom Ridge, as is George Pataki, as is Arnold Schwarzenegger, as is Paul Cellucci, as is John Rowland (although I assume he wouldn't be denied communion for massive graft and corruption).

At some point, I think you may have to consider the design flaws in the Catholic Church. There's about 15 levels of doctrinal authority, lots of major papal reversals over the centuries, all topped off with Captain Infallibility. And that's before you get to the weird, gooey supernatural substance inside.

Posted by: Norbizness at April 27, 2004 1:54 PM

I've read several opinions on these issues and they're all over the map. The one I feel inclined to support is a quote I read in an article from a canon law expert at Georgetown. He said you can only deny communion to someone if they've been excommunicated by name. There are a few extraordinary exceptions to this, like if someone committed a murder in public and hadn't yet been excommunicated for it.

A priest in St. Louis did say he wouldn't give Kerry communion. Kerry avoided an Easter confrontation at the Boston Archbishop's cathedral by going to mass elsewhere. Arbishop O'Malley has made some ambiguous statements on this one.

All I can definitively answer is yes and yes to #1 and #5.

Posted by: Dimmy Karras at April 27, 2004 2:34 PM

Hmm is anyone else encountering problems with the images on this blog loading? I'm trying to figure out if its a problem on my end or if it's the blog. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.

Posted by: Hilma Westbrooks at August 15, 2011 6:12 PM

An impressive share, I just given this onto a colleague who was doing a bit of analysis on this. And he actually purchased me breakfast as a result of I found it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the treat! But yeah Thnkx for spending the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love reading more on this topic. If possible, as you turn out to be experience, would you thoughts updating your blog with more details? It's extremely useful for me. Huge thumb up for this blog put up!

Posted by: cheap movie rentals at August 17, 2011 11:21 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?