The Austin American-Statesman hosts a poll asking readers to identify the best art gallery in town. Readers give the top nod to Art on 5th, an art outlet that, while hip, sells primarily by consignment and doesn't exactly exhibit shows from the bleeding edge of contemporary art. In response, Jeanne Claire van Ryzin, the paper's arts critic, takes to the blog ("Seeing Things") to complain (in the grand tradition of critics) about the wisdom of crowds—and slams the paper for running the survey.
Someone at the Statesman took notice and by all appearances wasn't pleased—the post's been scrubbed from the blog. (Hat tip: Eric Zimmerman.) Deleting published articles is messin' with critics at its worst. The Statesman ought to clarify whether that's what's happened.
Posted by Kriston at August 4, 2008 12:56 PMAside from the consignment issue, what has selling from the bleeding edge to do with being the best gallery?
Posted by: ben wolfson at August 5, 2008 2:27 AMs/selling/exhibiting/, obviously.
Posted by: ben wolfson at August 5, 2008 2:28 AMIt's good for the gallery's reputation with critics.
Posted by: Kriston at August 5, 2008 8:57 AMArguably, that was a non-sequitur.
Posted by: ben wolfson at August 5, 2008 12:54 PMYour Blog is so sweet! Your posts give me ideas and I start really thinking. Thank you!
Posted by: Federico Rumfelt at March 27, 2011 1:48 AMI love reading your post! Great information and it is also very well written. I will bookmark and comeback soon.
Posted by: Harold Yi at June 30, 2011 1:03 AMBe grateful for the good writeup. It in actual fact was obviously a amusement account it. Look advanced to more added agreeable of your stuff! However, how could we communicate?
Posted by: Roy Alcide at July 8, 2011 7:47 PM