It is the V you double, not the U, as if to use
two valleys in a valise is to savvy the vacuum
of a vowel at a powwow in between sawteeth.
It is to ask the painter of a watercolour hue:
'why owe you twice what a sheep is or a tree,
if the fee you double has to hew you a puzzle?'
An enigma, like a game in E, its jigsaw zigzag
never fits the excess void left behind by X,
the exit on the way from 'why' to what is said.
If you glean an anagram from each angle, do you
dabble with your double view of what you hate:
a swastika that awaits your Olympiad of riddles?
Is this letter a residuum of what troubles you?
If you slice it down the middle, does it not
hereafter indicate a twofold victory over life?
If it maps the rise and fall of fortune, like a yo-yo,
why oh, why oh, must you find four palm trees
in a park, if not to make of them your symbol?
It is the name for an X whose V does not view
the surface of a lake but the mirror on a wall,
where U and you become a tautonym, a continuum.
—Christian Bök
Posted by Kriston at August 3, 2009 1:11 PMWow. I'm in a state of humbled awe. Excuse me while I go buy Eunoia and read it 20 times. Holy cow.
Posted by: J.V. at August 13, 2009 4:50 PMOh yeah, it's an exceptional, taut poem. I assigned the book for a class I taught to illustrate the notion that a text written according to a constraint describes that constraint. Which is evident in a lot of Minimalist (visual) work but not illustrated super clearly by Minimalism in the main.
That fit the class I was teaching, but I also think it suits the book to put in with visual art. I might be wrong on all points about this but I've seen it lumped in with Oulipo and I don't think it fits.
Posted by: Kriston at August 13, 2009 7:06 PMI love reading your post! Great information and it is also very well written. I will bookmark and comeback soon.
Posted by: Frederick Prestridge at June 30, 2011 1:50 PM